• Latest
‚One-Stop Shop‘ for Crypto Mining and Trading to Launch Spot Market May 23

No, Concentration Among Miners Isn’t Going to Break Bitcoin

Februar 20, 2020
6 Questions for Rene Reinsberg of Celo – Cointelegraph Magazine

6 Questions for Rene Reinsberg of Celo – Cointelegraph Magazine

März 31, 2023
Judge denies SEC motion to keep Hinman docs secret in Ripple case

Judge denies SEC motion to keep Hinman docs secret in Ripple case

März 31, 2023
The ultimate guide to Miami – Cointelegraph Magazine

The ultimate guide to Miami – Cointelegraph Magazine

März 31, 2023
Dr. Jane Thomason – Cointelegraph Magazine

Dr. Jane Thomason – Cointelegraph Magazine

März 31, 2023
1658007797 celsius is bankrupt with 12b balance sheet hole su zhu.jpg

Celsius is bankrupt with $1.2B balance sheet hole, Su Zhu returns to Twitter and OpenSea purges 20% of employees: Hodler’s Digest, July 10-16

März 31, 2023
6 Questions for Lisa Fridman of Quadrata – Cointelegraph Magazine

6 Questions for Lisa Fridman of Quadrata – Cointelegraph Magazine

März 31, 2023
Jed McCaleb empties XRP wallet after eight-year selloff

Jed McCaleb empties XRP wallet after eight-year selloff

März 31, 2023
Celsius has finally filed for bankruptcy: Law Decoded, July 18-25

Celsius has finally filed for bankruptcy: Law Decoded, July 18-25

März 31, 2023
The ‘godfather of crypto’ risked lifetime in jail, laying foundation for Bitcoin – Cointelegraph Magazine

The ‘godfather of crypto’ risked lifetime in jail, laying foundation for Bitcoin – Cointelegraph Magazine

März 31, 2023
SEC objects to XRP holders aiding Ripple defense

SEC objects to XRP holders aiding Ripple defense

März 31, 2023
Blockchain technology is transforming the real estate market – Cointelegraph Magazine

Blockchain technology is transforming the real estate market – Cointelegraph Magazine

März 31, 2023
1658612147 nfts banned in minecraft sec lists 9 tokens as securities.jpg

NFTs banned in Minecraft, SEC lists 9 tokens as securities and 3AC founder blames cockyness for company meltdown: Hodler’s Digest, July 17-23

März 31, 2023
  • Home
  • Coin Market Cap
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Ripple
  • Litecoin
  • Alt Coin
  • Business
  • Trading
  • Mining
CoinNewsDaily
  • Home
  • Coin Market Cap
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Ripple
  • Litecoin
  • Alt Coin
  • Business
  • Trading
  • Mining
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Coin Market Cap
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Ripple
  • Litecoin
  • Alt Coin
  • Business
  • Trading
  • Mining
No Result
View All Result
CoinNewsDaily
No Result
View All Result
Home Bitcoin

No, Concentration Among Miners Isn’t Going to Break Bitcoin

coinnewsdaily by coinnewsdaily
Februar 20, 2020
in Bitcoin
0
‚One-Stop Shop‘ for Crypto Mining and Trading to Launch Spot Market May 23
190
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

CoinDesk columnist Hasu is a pseudonymous crypto researcher publishing analyses for Deribit Insights and his personal blog.

A recent TokenAnalyst report claims a single entity could be in control of around 50 percent of bitcoin’s hashrate. The observation is based on the fact that five large mining pools have launched a new cloud mining service as a joint venture.

Related articles

Top 3 cryptocurrencies that are faring the best in the 2022 bear market

Top 3 cryptocurrencies that are faring the best in the 2022 bear market

Mai 24, 2022
Price analysis 5/23: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, AVAX, SHIB

Price analysis 5/23: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, AVAX, SHIB

Mai 23, 2022

“In 2020, Bitcoin has […] become a highly centralized system that places an increasing amount of trust in a small number of large entities. Any centralization of Bitcoin network hash power should be of concern as it erodes the trustless model of the network,” TokenAnalyst, a cryptocurrency research firm, says.

Its strong language is consistent with the folk theorem that bitcoin relies on the decentralization of hash power to be secure. But is it also correct?

Concentration is inevitable

It is certainly true that one miner with 100 percent of the hash power would have more control over the network than miners with 10 percent hash power. A majority miner can reorganize the blockchain to double-spend his own transactions or even block any unwanted transactions from making it into the blockchain.

If a majority miner can misbehave and hurt users, does that mean users should try whatever they can to prevent centralization in hash power?

Former Bitcoin Core developer Greg Maxwell sees that as a futile task, given that “[an attack] doesn’t even depend on a single person having too much of the hash power. The attack would work just as well if there were 100 people each with an equal amount and a majority of them colluded to dishonestly override the result.”

This insight is important because it shows we can not rule out concentration, ever. Miners can always collude with each other and act as a single entity. It would be ludicrous to trust a system that can collapse after a single conference call – that’s all it would take to coordinate the behavior of the largest mining pools. And if miners could make more money by colluding with each other, we should expect that they will.

Rationality means agents do what is best for them, even if that means colluding with other miners to attack the system.

And – according to Maxwell – this problem might not have a solution, as “any mechanism that would let you prevent one party (much less secret collusion) from having too much authority would almost certainly let you just replace mining entirely.”

So if the concentration of hash power in proof-of-work, or of stake in proof-of-stake, is inevitable, why am I not worried?

Concentration is harmless

The answer is that bitcoin’s design doesn’t assume mining power is widely distributed. It’s simply not a requirement. Instead, it only assumes miners are rational, which is something completely different. Rationality means agents do what is best for them, even if that means colluding with other miners to attack the system.

Satoshi addressed this matter directly in the white paper:

The incentive may help encourage nodes to stay honest. If a greedy attacker is able to assemble more CPU power than all the honest nodes, he would have to choose between using it to defraud people by stealing back his payments, or using it to generate new coins. He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules, such rules that favour him with more new coins than everyone else combined, than to undermine the system and the validity of his own wealth.

Let’s unpack this a bit. It is the incentive in the form of new coins and transaction fees that motivate the majority to “stay honest.” Satoshi realized that the only way to prevent a “greedy attacker” from taking over is to make it more profitable to play by the rules than to attack the system.

This is the key to bitcoin’s assurances and at the same time the most widely misunderstood aspect of bitcoin’s design.

Economist Paul Sztorc even says he is “most comfortable just assuming that everyone is always in perfect collusion with everyone else. Specifically that all of the hashpower is actually owned-and-operated by one guy, whom we might call “Mr. Greed.” […] Why doesn’t Mr. Greed doublespend, you ask? (He can reorganize the chain at any time.) Well, Mr. Greed prefers to keep all of the new coins for himself, rather than undermine the system (and the validity of his own wealth).”

I must admit, I was not comfortable with what I perceived bitcoin’s security model to be initially. If bitcoin were vulnerable the moment a group of colluding miners obtains 51 percent of hash power, how could we possibly monitor – let alone prevent – this? Moreover, why are smaller forks like BCH and BSV not constantly under attack, given that several individual mining pools in BTC control more hash power than their entire networks?

The dissonance disappeared when I realized that hash power concentration doesn’t actually matter. Bitcoin is secure not because it is impossible to attack, but because it is costly to attack.

The real cost of attack

The cost of an attack is directly related to how much hash power the attacker owns. That is the key finding of a paper I released with Curtis and Prestwich in 2019. In a simplified model, we estimated the present value of all mining operations in bitcoin at around 658,800 BTC or $6B at current bitcoin prices. (Consequently, 60 percent of hash power is worth around 395,000 BTC or $3.6B, and so on.)

The present value of these miners depends on the value of the network because their future profit is exclusively from block rewards. They are priced in Bitcoin’s native token, BTC. If something happened to bitcoin that would make users lose trust in the system, these 658,800 BTC could lose their value in real terms, incurring a large opportunity cost.

Let’s say an attacker with 60 percent hash power decided to attack the network. If the attack depresses the price of bitcoin by only 10 percent, a rather conservative guess, he would lose $360m in future profit. This is the opportunity cost of his attack.

This number – also called security margin – gives us an idea of how much an attacker has to be able to gain just to break even with his attack. And it does not yet include the ability for the other 40 percent of hash power to push back, or the ability of users to respond with their own nuclear option of changing the PoW algorithm.

The same logic has been replicated in the recent paper “Too Big to Cheat: Mining Pools‘ Incentives to Double Spend in Blockchain Based Cryptocurrencies” by Savolainen and Soria. The authors conclude that “the historically observed pool concentration does not indicate a higher risk of double-spending attacks. […] This result demonstrates the well-known economic insight that feasibility does not imply desirability.”

Takeaways

Mining concentration is inevitable. Mining concentration is also harmless as attacks on bitcoin incur an opportunity cost that scales with the amount of hash power an attacker controls. An attacker with a lot of hash power would incur a large cost.

As a result, the system ensures that miners with more control have a stronger vested interest in its protection as well.

Thanks to their feedback to Su Zhu, Nic Carter, Eric Wall, Mike Co, and Loomdart.

Disclosure Read More

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Credit: Source link

Share76Tweet48
Previous Post

South Korea’s Central Bank Is Building a New Blockchain System for the Bond Market

Next Post

Dutch Authorities Arrest 2 in Million-Euro Crypto Money Laundering Investigations

coinnewsdaily

coinnewsdaily

CoinNewsDaily.com is an online Crypto Coin News Website that aims to provide latest trendy news from market and around the world.

Related Posts

Top 3 cryptocurrencies that are faring the best in the 2022 bear market
Alt Coin

Top 3 cryptocurrencies that are faring the best in the 2022 bear market

Mai 24, 2022
Price analysis 5/23: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, AVAX, SHIB
Alt Coin

Price analysis 5/23: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, AVAX, SHIB

Mai 23, 2022
Top 5 cryptocurrencies to watch this week: BTC, BNB, XMR, ETC, MANA
Alt Coin

Top 5 cryptocurrencies to watch this week: BTC, BNB, XMR, ETC, MANA

Mai 22, 2022
Weaker dollar lifts Bitcoin to $30.7K as analyst eyes 60% BTC dominance
Alt Coin

Weaker dollar lifts Bitcoin to $30.7K as analyst eyes 60% BTC dominance

Mai 20, 2022
Here’s why Terra’s snowball effect could send Avalanche (AVAX) price to $15
Alt Coin

Here’s why Terra’s snowball effect could send Avalanche (AVAX) price to $15

Mai 19, 2022
Price analysis 5/18: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, AVAX, SHIB
Bitcoin

Price analysis 5/18: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, AVAX, SHIB

Mai 19, 2022
Load More
Next Post
Dutch Authorities Arrest 2 in Million-Euro Crypto Money Laundering Investigations

Dutch Authorities Arrest 2 in Million-Euro Crypto Money Laundering Investigations

Kategorien

  • Alt Coin
  • Bitcoin
  • Business
  • Ethereum
  • ICO
  • Litecoin
  • Mining
  • NFT
  • Ripple
  • Tech
  • Trading

What New here?

  • 6 Questions for Rene Reinsberg of Celo – Cointelegraph Magazine
  • Judge denies SEC motion to keep Hinman docs secret in Ripple case
  • The ultimate guide to Miami – Cointelegraph Magazine
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy & Policy

© 2018-2021 CoinNewsDaily.com by CoinNewsDaily Inc. Crafted with Love by iFtiDev

Please enter CoinMarketCap Free Api Key to get this plugin works.
✕
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Coin Market Cap
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Ripple
  • Litecoin
  • Alt Coin
  • Business
  • Trading
  • Mining

© 2018-2021 CoinNewsDaily.com by CoinNewsDaily Inc. Crafted with Love by iFtiDev